Compare · vs Graphite (Cursor)
Acuvis vs Graphite (Cursor)
Graphite makes shipping smaller PRs easier. Acuvis makes the big ones reviewable: a walkthrough in review order, a map of what it touches, and a Files view built for reviewing.
Graphite (Cursor). Stacked-PR workflow tool with the Diamond AI reviewer, now part of Cursor since December 2025. Strong on PR stacking and merge automation; review experience is a polished GitHub layer with a SIEM-style audit log available on Enterprise.
When Acuvis wins
- Your team can't realistically split into stacked PRs every time
- You review compliance- or migration-driven changes that touch 30+ files at once
- You want a review IDE that isn't bundled inside Cursor
- Procurement is wary of the Cursor acquisition reshaping your contract
- You need a hash-chained, offline-verifiable audit log
When Graphite (Cursor) wins
- Your team has fully adopted stacked PRs
- You're already on Cursor and want everything in one editor
- PR-shipping velocity matters more than reviewing big diffs
- You want SOC 2 Type II available right now
| Capability | Acuvis | Graphite (Cursor) |
|---|---|---|
| 2D dependency canvas (graph view of PR) | ||
| Files auto-grouped by dependency | ||
| Guided walkthrough in review order | ||
| Stacked-PR workflow | ||
| AI review on PRs | ||
| Standalone review surface (not bundled in an IDE) | ||
| Hash-chained, verifiable audit log | ||
| Firecracker microVM isolation per PR | ||
| Free for open source | on application | |
| SOC 2 Type II | planned | |
| Independent vendor (not part of an IDE acquisition) |
See it on your own pull request.
A walkthrough of a change you know is easier to judge than a comparison table. The first five pull requests are free.