Compare · vs Greptile
Acuvis vs Greptile
Greptile is great at understanding your codebase. Acuvis is great at showing one PR's shape: a 2D dependency canvas you can zoom from cluster to a single line, with a hash-chained audit trail.
Greptile. Codebase-aware AI review (YC W24) with strong cross-repo context, confidence scores per PR, and auto-generated sequence/ERD/class/flow diagrams inside the GitHub diff.
When Acuvis wins
- You want to triage a 50-file PR in under 10 minutes from one screen
- Reviewers think in subsystems and dependencies, not file paths
- You want a signed audit chain of every review action
- Per-review pricing with unlimited reviewers matters more than per-seat licensing
- Color-coded concern families matter to how your team triages
When Greptile wins
- You want chat-style Q&A against the whole repo
- Cross-repo codebase context is your primary need
- Auto-generated explanatory diagrams (sequence, ERD, class) in PRs are valuable to you
- You're happy with the existing GitHub review UI and want it smarter
| Capability | Acuvis | Greptile |
|---|---|---|
| 2D dependency canvas (graph view of PR) | ||
| Files auto-grouped by dependency | ||
| Multi-resolution zoom | ||
| AI-generated diagrams in PRs | ||
| Codebase chat / repo Q&A | ||
| Confidence score per PR | ||
| AI review on PRs | ||
| Hash-chained / signed audit log | ||
| Per-review pricing (unlimited reviewers) | ||
| Firecracker microVM isolation per PR | ||
| Free for public repositories | qualified OSS | |
| EU-hosted control plane |
See it on your own PR.
The cluster canvas is a genuinely different way to read code review. Easier to show than describe.