Compare · vs Greptile
Acuvis vs Greptile
Greptile is great at understanding your codebase. Acuvis is built for reading one pull request: a walkthrough in review order, a map of what it touches, and a Files view for the lines that matter.
Greptile. Codebase-aware AI review (YC W24) with strong cross-repo context, confidence scores per PR, and auto-generated sequence/ERD/class/flow diagrams inside the GitHub diff.
When Acuvis wins
- You want to triage a 50-file PR in under 10 minutes from one screen
- Reviewers think in subsystems and dependencies, not file paths
- You want a hash-chained, verifiable log of every review action
- A lower price per developer matters to you
- Color-coded concern families matter to how your team triages
When Greptile wins
- You want chat-style Q&A against the whole repo
- Cross-repo codebase context is your primary need
- Auto-generated explanatory diagrams (sequence, ERD, class) in PRs are valuable to you
- You're happy with the existing GitHub review UI and want it smarter
| Capability | Acuvis | Greptile |
|---|---|---|
| 2D dependency canvas (graph view of PR) | ||
| Files auto-grouped by dependency | ||
| Guided walkthrough in review order | ||
| AI-generated diagrams in PRs | ||
| Codebase chat / repo Q&A | ||
| Confidence score per PR | ||
| AI review on PRs | ||
| Hash-chained, verifiable audit log | ||
| Firecracker microVM isolation per PR | ||
| Free for open source | on application | qualified OSS |
| EU-hosted control plane |
See it on your own pull request.
A walkthrough of a change you know is easier to judge than a comparison table. The first five pull requests are free.